Black-throated Blues

Before I began watching birds, I could identify a bare few of them: cardinals, robins, mourning doves, “sparrows,” things seen on bird feeders or everywhere. One day in the late 1990s when I lived on the top floor of a Park Slope rowhouse, I noticed a small dark bird moving quickly through the tree out back. We were almost eye-level, that bird and I. The bird looked blue-black on top and white underneath, and I’d never seen anything like it before. It was a very active animal, and I found it difficult to get a good clean view of it, yet it was quite distinctive. There were little patches of white on its blue wings. This was one dapper creature, with its own handkerchief accent. (I used to think I picked up that description from Roger Tory Peterson, but it isn’t in his classic field guide, so I don’t know where it came from.) I had no idea what it might be, but I eventually discovered it was a male Black-throated Blue Warbler (Setophaga caerulescens). I have seen a good number of them since. They are not uncommon, if you look, this time of year. The other day, though, I happened to see one through the binoculars from above, which isn’t the usual perspective on a warbler. There was a rusty purplish to the wings. I’d never seen this detail before.

And more recently, I found this corpse, a probable victim of a large sheet of glass. Setophaga caerulescensEvery photograph is a picture of death, isn’t it? Setophaga caerulescens

Cyanocitta cristataA baby Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata), I’d guess, from those blue wing feathers that were just pushing out. Falling from the nest is not uncommon these days.Icterus galbulaIs there anything less life-like than a dead song bird? Hard to say what happened to this female Baltimore Oriole (Icterus galbula), which was laying besides a tree, far from glass.Icterus galbula

3 Responses to “Black-throated Blues”

  1. 1 Katie (Nature ID) June 1, 2013 at 10:50 am

    Oh, that’s too bad. So often the only time I get a good close-up look at a bird to positively ID it is after they’re already dead.

  2. 2 Elizabeth June 1, 2013 at 10:52 am

    I used to have to try to ID the non-moving versions for NYCA’s Project Safe Flight, which was studying the impact (literally) of birds flying into glass windows. Easier to see and ID when they’re not moving, but I’d rather put up with the difficulty.

    Fortunately, with the information NYCA gathered, one of the worst kill sites was convinced to do something, and there are almost no deaths there now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Bookmark and Share

Join 679 other followers
Nature Blog Network


%d bloggers like this: