Devil’s Walkingstick

What a great name, and perfectly understandable when you get a look at the young shoots and stems. Aralia spinosa is a native understory shrub, sometimes a small tree, of the East Coast, particularly the South. You can find it in all the boroughs; this patch was along the north end of the loop around Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge. And it is a patch; the plant will grow by clonal offshoot and makes an awesome natural border. It’s also known as Hercules Club and Prickly Ash, but this is where common names get confusing since those names are also used for the unreleated Southern Prickly Ash (Zanthoxylum clava-herculis).

UPDATE: Or maybe it’s Aralia elata, the Japanese Angelica tree that is very similar, and in the same genus, and invasive. Reader Jessica (see comments) suggests further study is needed.
A large photograph for a large leaf (click to open a larger version). It is in fact the largest leaf in our woods, reaching up to 5 feet long. That’s because these leaves are bipinnately compound, that is, made up of leaflets divided into subleaflets (as distinct from a simple leaf). Picture a maple leaf: the slightly swollen end of it’s leafstalk or petiole, where it attaches to the stem, makes that a simple leaf. The leafstalk of these big bipinnately compound leaves also ends in a swollen joint, which are correspondingly quite large for these large leaves, but the leaflets do not: You can also see (smaller) bipinnately compound leaves on Honeylocust, Golden Rain-tree, and Kentucky Coffee-tree, all found on Brooklyn’s streets.

2 Responses to “Devil’s Walkingstick”


  1. 1 jessica May 2, 2012 at 2:03 pm

    Aralia spinosa is very often confused with Aralia elata, Japanese Angelica tree. It would be worth investigating the specimens in Jamaica Bay, most likely they are actually the invasive, Aralia elata. A good source for working out the differences between the two is, Mistaken Identity (http://www.nybg.org/files/scientists/rnaczi/Mistaken_Identity_Final.pdf)

    • 2 mthew May 9, 2012 at 10:06 am

      Thanks for this comment, Jessica, and sorry it took so long for me to reply. And thanks for the link to that report: great stuff, although the photos didn’t translate.

      These problematic genuses! This looks like a case for getting back out to JBWR soon, although I know a small sample in Prospect Park that I can probably take a look at sooner.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s




Share

Bookmark and Share

Join 679 other followers
Nature Blog Network

Archives


%d bloggers like this: